<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, It&#8217;s Another Actual Transcript.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ispuddle.com/2009/04/17/yes-its-another-actual-transcript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ispuddle.com/2009/04/17/yes-its-another-actual-transcript/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spuddleblog</title>
		<link>http://ispuddle.com/2009/04/17/yes-its-another-actual-transcript/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>spuddleblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ispuddle.com/?p=127#comment-54</guid>
		<description>But your transcript is adorable!    Mine is more... well, I don&#039;t know.   I like TV, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But your transcript is adorable!    Mine is more&#8230; well, I don&#8217;t know.   I like TV, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tori</title>
		<link>http://ispuddle.com/2009/04/17/yes-its-another-actual-transcript/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ispuddle.com/?p=127#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Our transcript goes something like this (it has gone like this for the past ten years, from age 5 until now, age 15 *and a half* (yes I had to put that half in there):

Me: I love you.
M: No, I love YOU more.
Me: No, I love you more because I&#039;m the mom and you&#039;re my baby.
M: No, I love you more because I&#039;m the baby and you&#039;re the Mom.
Me: But if I lost you I would be bereft.
M: But if I lost you I wouldn&#039;t have a mom.
Me: But still I love you more.
M: No, I love YOU more.
...and so on until one of us gives up. Usually me.

Over the years it has become shortened to:

Love ya!
Love ya more!
Nope, love YOU more!
Nope, Love YOU more!
...
Or - on text message:

Can I go to the mall with Christine? Luvs ya more! &lt;3



I can&#039;t get enough of your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our transcript goes something like this (it has gone like this for the past ten years, from age 5 until now, age 15 *and a half* (yes I had to put that half in there):</p>
<p>Me: I love you.<br />
M: No, I love YOU more.<br />
Me: No, I love you more because I&#8217;m the mom and you&#8217;re my baby.<br />
M: No, I love you more because I&#8217;m the baby and you&#8217;re the Mom.<br />
Me: But if I lost you I would be bereft.<br />
M: But if I lost you I wouldn&#8217;t have a mom.<br />
Me: But still I love you more.<br />
M: No, I love YOU more.<br />
&#8230;and so on until one of us gives up. Usually me.</p>
<p>Over the years it has become shortened to:</p>
<p>Love ya!<br />
Love ya more!<br />
Nope, love YOU more!<br />
Nope, Love YOU more!<br />
&#8230;<br />
Or &#8211; on text message:</p>
<p>Can I go to the mall with Christine? Luvs ya more! &lt;3</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t get enough of your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayton</title>
		<link>http://ispuddle.com/2009/04/17/yes-its-another-actual-transcript/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ispuddle.com/?p=127#comment-52</guid>
		<description>it is one game into the 2009 stanley cup playoffs... canucks are 1-0... this is an entirely reasonable response from him given the parameters of the situation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is one game into the 2009 stanley cup playoffs&#8230; canucks are 1-0&#8230; this is an entirely reasonable response from him given the parameters of the situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

