On Choosing Your Cause and Believing, Against All Odds, In The Power Of People to Actually Change Their Minds.
Seaworld spokespeople are now saying that perhaps they won’t use “Tilly” in any more performance-based shows. This is what we call “spin”. They are facing a lot of pressure from activist groups. They are going to play the middle ground until this story drops out of the news.
Then Tilly will perform again. And the next person who accidentally falls into his pool? I wouldn’t want to be that person.
Of course, the idea that they would euthanize or remove the whale is ludicrous, the whale is priceless. Consider that it is no longer legal to capture wild orcas for marine parks and the sperm of whales born in capitivity is much less viable (draw your own conclusions there). In order to continue milking the great cash cow that is captive killer whales, it is imperative that Seaworld keep Tilikum alive and healthy and breeding. Period. Full stop.
And if he can perform for money along the way, well, GREAT.
This is not news.
I’ve been thinking about this a lot in the last few days, obviously, and I feel like crying, gnashing my teeth, wringing my hands. Because no matter how strongly I feel, no matter how strongly YOU feel, the only people who can change anything are, indeed, the people at Seaworld.
And if one of them dared to speak up and suggest that Seaworld might have to change their focus, indeed their BRANDING which focuses entirely on the happy-go-lucky orca that they’ve created in a nation’s imagination, they would be fired and there are no end of humans willing to fill their six-figure jobs.
There is an ENDLESS supply of humans who would happily exploit killer whales so that they can drive a Mercedes and live in 5000 square feet of ocean-fronting luxury.
THERE IS NO END.
So even if one executive changes his tune. Even if one person starts to care…
So what?
IS it impossible?
Maybe it is.
****
This whale story will not leave the news. It’s stuck there, like a chicken bone in the throat of a nation. It has become the subject of heated debate on the internet, on television, everywhere you go people have an opinion. A LOT of people seem to think that Seaworld is some sort of saviour of the animals. That seeing wild animal shows gives them a love for animals that extends to saving the animals in the wild. That what happened was a horrible accident but that the show must go on for the greater good. For the whales’ sake.
It’s SAVING them.
Saving them from WHAT?
They wouldn’t NEED saving if it weren’t for humans, determined as we are to love them so.
****
The news has, for the most part, been downright silly, not the least reason of which is probably at the behest of the madly spinning PR wheels of Seaworld itself. That some right-wing fundamentalist Christian group is calling for a stoning of the whale is probably the best thing to happen for Seaworld in days. THAT story can be played up to eye-rolling and laughter. THAT story can deflect from the facts. THAT story will make people choose sides, and in so doing, obviously will choose Seaworld’s rational-sounding scientists over extremist religious ideology.
The dozens of other groups that have offered up entirely viable alternatives do not get much typespace in the papers and certainly no air time on TV. The “better” story is the comical, unrealistic one — for one thing, it’s probably not even possible to STONE a whale to death — because people want to feel superior and to laugh. Yes, laugh. Because it’s stupid. It’s a stupid idea, an extremist group who wants attention, and at the end of the day, it’s a joke.
But it also turns the larger story into a joke. The truth gets muddied behind all the hilarity.
And there is still nothing hilarious about it.
***
When I wrote my last blog post, I felt like I have a few times in my life after delivering an impassioned speech. When I’m done, I feel like YES, I have won at least THIS audience, THIS group of people over to my way of thinking. And then, on my way out, I hear someone saying, “Yeah, well, I still like the whale show.”
And I’m entirely deflated.
***
I got a lot of, “Well, I’m not one of those animal activists, but I guess it probably is a bit wrong.” Wha-huh?
For one thing, why is “animal activist” seen as such an eye-roller? Why would you NOT want to identify with animal activists? It makes me think of feminism and how people who misunderstand the fundamental definition of feminism who say, “Well, I’m not a feminist BUT…”
You ARE a feminist if you believe that women should be paid the same as men for doing the same job.
You ARE an animal activist if you are willing to speak out about man’s inhumanity to beast. It’s not a bad thing, people. It’s really not.
****
To make matters even more complicated, the family of Dawn Brancheau is now fighting a legal battle to keep the footage of the incident off YOUR TV. I have mixed feelings about this. First and foremost, I feel their pain. No, it should not be on TV. Absolutely. NOT.
It is not a spectacle. It is not entertainment.
On the other hand, I’m also suspicious. Not of the family, no. But of Seaworld. I think that SEAWORLD wants to keep this video off your TV. Because I’ve seen it. I don’t know why I watched it. On many levels, I wish that I hadn’t.
I was shocked, in spite of what I’d heard, in spite of what I already knew. Shocked that the person wielding the camera (the footage begins with a shot of his/her little girl, watching the show) did not put the camera down and at least shield their child — who looked to be around four — from witnessing the horror. Shocked that there wasn’t more alarm, more of an emergency atmosphere, more basic human panic.
I didn’t watch it all, but I watched the first couple of minutes, and what I saw was the girl in the water and the whale exhibiting the same whale behaviour that you see when wild whales “play” — a behaviour that mimics hunting without the kill — with seals.
I saw the whale let go many many times, the girl swimming in the water.
I saw NO ONE extending a net to pull her out. NO ONE extending any sort of visible help. Three or four other trainers stood on the deck, gesturing. Maybe they were screaming, I don’t know, there was no sound, but it looked pretty restrained.
I’m not sure of the power of the gesture but I’m guessing that a 12,000 pound wild animal doesn’t pay much heed to it. Which he didn’t.
Obviously.
From my untrained eye, it looked like no one had a clue what to do.
Not. A. Clue.
This was an animal that had killed twice before. Was there no procedure in place? If not, who is responsible?
It comes down to the same answer:
SEAWORLD.
Seaworld was entirely responsible. 100%. The people. Not the animal.
I do not blame the victim, she was doing her job and by all accounts was good at it. She chose a job that I would not have chosen, but so what? It was not her FAULT, nor did she invite it. She was following instructions from the people who signed her paycheque.
Full stop.
****
The other “new” part of this story that I find chilling is the 911 call. Have you heard it? I’ve never heard anyone sound so blase about something so extreme. I’ve never heard anyone so casual in the face of a situation so dire.
Did the people at Seaworld honestly not know of this animal’s history? Did they not understand?
****
Another blog I read suggested that people who are focussing time on attention on the situation are selfish. Don’t they know that people are starving to death? PEOPLE. In America. Who CARES about the whales when there is so much MORE to care about? Isn’t cancer more important? Isn’t there a long long list of what should come first? Aren’t the people who actually devote their lives to saving the killer whales sort of… silly?
NO.
They aren’t. There are a million causes. All of them have merit, all of them are important to someone. Every single person would prioritize them differently.
No one is saying you should quit your day job and sign up for Greenpeace. No one is suggesting you devote your life to shutting down Seaworld and its ilk.
We are — I am — suggesting only this: STOP going to see the whales in captivity. Let your money talk. You can then TAKE that money and spend it on a charity of your choice. It’s activism without you having to do a single thing.
All YOU have to do is say “No.”
Please. Even if you think it’s silly, even if you actually don’t care that much.
Just say NO.
Is that so much to ask?
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Filed under: Whales | No Comments »







